When the fat gets trimmed I would move to axonometrics to be able to work both side and front profiles. Lots of the delicate arc schemes would get an immediate boost in intrigue. #7 strikes me as the most developed in this sense, but might prove difficult to manufacture. Which ones did they lean to?
Lots of great stuff here.I bet any of these designs could get refined into something awesome.I think this may end up being one of your best portfolio page-spreads.The identical material highlight makes some of the feel artificially similar, or perhaps just part of a "family" of designs.
One new crit after my fourth viewing.I think it's a comment on the rendering style rather than the design itself.I am looking for a large shape and I'm not getting one (at least from the images -- the real mailboxes built from these plans might not exhibit this strange quality) -- I see all spaghetti lines and big gradients. I don't feel like I get a satisfying "camera-facing plane". Maybe reducing the value-span of the gradients would create a stronger shape-read.
Nice comments! thanks...I'll address these issues this week! Had a good talk with Shang about the ones they picked...will post when I have new stuff.
Post a Comment